Approximate reasoning with fuzzy rule interpolation: background and recent advances
نویسندگان
چکیده
Abstract Approximate reasoning systems facilitate fuzzy inference through activating if–then rules in which attribute values are imprecisely described. Fuzzy rule interpolation (FRI) supports such with sparse bases where certain observations may not match any existing rules, manipulation of that bear similarity an unmatched observation. This differs from classical rule-based requires direct pattern matching between and the given rules. FRI techniques have been continuously investigated for decades, resulting various types approach. Traditionally, it is typically assumed all antecedent attributes equal significance deriving consequents. Recent studies shown significant interest developing enhanced mechanisms associated relative weights, signifying their different importance levels influencing generation conclusion, thereby improving performance. survey presents a systematic review both traditional recently developed methodologies, categorised accordingly into two major groups: non-weighted weighted It introduces, analyses, range commonly used representatives chosen each categories, offering comprehensive tutorial this important soft computing approach to inference. A comparative analysis provided within category two, highlighting main strengths limitations while applying problems. Furthermore, adopted criteria algorithm evaluation outlined, recent developments on methods presented unified pseudo-code form, easing understanding facilitating comparisons.
منابع مشابه
Approximate reasoning by linear rule interpolation and general approximation
The problem of sparse fuzzy rule bases is introduced. Because of the high computational complexity of the original compositional rule of inference (CRI) method, it is strongly suggested that the number of rules in a final fuzzy knowledge base is drastically reduced. Various methods of analogical reasoning available in the literature are reviewed. The mapping style interpretation of fuzzy rules ...
متن کاملSingle Rule Reasoning Methods in Fuzzy Rule Interpolation
Systems applying fuzzy logic rule bases produce the output as a result of a fuzzy reasoning process. Their rule base can be dense or sparse depending on whether a matching rule for all the possible input values exists, or not. In lack of a proper rule hit by the observation, the classical reasoning techniques like Zadeh’s (CRI), Mamdani’s, Larsen’s, etc. cannot afford an acceptable output. This...
متن کاملRecent Advances in Fuzzy Qualitative Reasoning
Fuzzy qualitative reasoning (FQR) is a form of approximate reasoning that can be defined loosely as the fusion of Fuzzy Reasoning (FR) with Qualitative Reasoning (QR). Both these research areas have as one of their goals the construction of computational reasoning tools that can predict and explain the behaviour of, often dynamic, systems whose analytic relations are incompletely specified. Whe...
متن کاملApproximate Reasoning with Fuzzy Booleans
This paper introduces, in analogy to the concept of fuzzy numbers, the concept of fuzzy booleans, and examines approximate reasoning with the compositional rule of inference using fuzzy booleans. It is shown that each set of fuzzy rules is equivalent to a set of fuzzy rules with singleton crisp antecedents; in case of fuzzy booleans this set contains only two rules. It is shown that Zadeh's ext...
متن کاملFuzzy Rule Interpolation
The “fuzzy dot” (or fuzzy relation) representation of fuzzy rules in fuzzy rule based systems, in case of classical fuzzy reasoning methods (e.g. the Zadeh-MamdaniLarsen Compositional Rule of Inference (CRI) (Zadeh, 1973) (Mamdani, 1975) (Larsen, 1980) or the Takagi Sugeno fuzzy inference (Sugeno, 1985) (Takagi & Sugeno, 1985)), are assuming the completeness of the fuzzy rule base. If there are...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Artificial Intelligence Review
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['0269-2821', '1573-7462']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-021-10005-3